Call for Case Study Candidates: Quantifying the Impact of Circular Economy

5REDO and its collaborating companies (ECD Compliance and Dillon Consulting) are conducting a research project for the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Group to develop a measurement and assessment framework for circularity performance in Canadian organizations. The objective is to support a fair and effective transition to a circular economy by informing future public policies and regulatory practices adapted to the Canadian economic landscape across all sectors. 

The current phase of the project focuses on identifying a robust set of indicators that interested parties can use to monitor circular performance, assess resulting impacts, and plan strategic improvements. To validate the proposed methodology, we are seeking real-world case studies from organizations engaged in circular economy initiatives. 

How Your Organization Can Help 

We are looking for companies willing to share information about their circularity-focused initiatives or business models. This collaboration will help test and refine the proposed methodology in applied, operational settings. 

The data required primarily relates to material flows within your operations, but may also include environmental, financial, or social performance indicators. A detailed Data Requirements Guide is available upon request. The process is designed to be low-burden, with our team guiding you through the data sharing and analysis steps. 

An advisory panel assembled by CSA Group will review candidate projects and select the case studies for inclusion in the research. Selection criteria include sector representation, type of circularity actions implemented, and data availability, among other factors. 

Benefits for Participating Organizations 

If selected, your organization will receive a free third-party circularity assessment, delivered as a comprehensive report. This report, similar in format to a life cycle assessment or carbon footprint analysis, will highlight the strengths and areas for improvement of your circular practices, along with their environmental, economic, and social impacts. 

The assessment can inform your sustainability strategy, help identify innovation opportunities, and better position your organization in anticipation of evolving regulatory frameworks. In addition, if you choose to publicize your involvement, the project may serve as a valuable example of leadership in sustainability and circular economy innovation. 

How to Get Involved 

To express interest or request more information, please contact Mahdi Takaffoli (CEO, 5REDO) at mahdi@5redo.ca. 


The Hidden Trade-Offs of Biodegradable Plastics: Balancing GHG Emissions and Ecotoxicity

Written by Fabien Hammerer, 5REDO CTO.


Microplastics are a growing environmental concern. Evidence shows their persistence in ecosystems and potential risks to both wildlife and human health. However, many questions remain about their environmental impacts—particularly concerning greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and ecotoxicity. Research led by Yuan Yao at Yale University sought to uncover the complexities of microplastic use through a life cycle assessment (LCA), revealing significant trade-offs that could influence our approach to sustainable plastics.

Biodegradable plastics, designed to break down in natural environments, often help reduce ecotoxicity, particularly in aquatic ecosystems. Yet, these benefits can come with a downside: increased GHG emissions. For instance, polylactic acid (PLA) has a relatively low GHG footprint but degrades slowly, potentially increasing aquatic toxicity. Conversely, some bioplastics that degrade faster can emit more GHGs if they break down in conditions that release methane, a potent greenhouse gas. This raises an essential question: is reducing one impact worth increasing another?

Effective end-of-life (EoL) management plays a key role in mitigating the environmental impact of biodegradable plastics. While it may seem eco-friendly to allow these plastics to biodegrade naturally, this can significantly increase GHG emissions. Studies show that plastics left in the natural environment may release more emissions compared to those processed in controlled settings like industrial composting or anaerobic digestion. In these engineered environments, emissions are captured and managed, lessening their climate impact.

Using bio-based sources for plastics is a common strategy to reduce carbon footprints, yet this alone may not be enough. Although plants absorb carbon during growth, this sequestration doesn’t fully compensate for emissions released when bio-sourced plastics degrade, especially under anaerobic conditions. Without proper EoL management, bio-sourced plastics could still contribute a net GHG burden, emphasizing the need for thoughtful disposal practices.

Finding a Balance for Sustainable Plastics

Yao’s research highlights that the environmental impacts of microplastics are multifaceted and complex. More research is needed to understand how different materials, particle sizes, and degradation pathways interact with ecosystems. This evolving knowledge base will help us develop refined solutions for reducing plastic pollution.

These findings emphasize that sustainable plastics require a balanced approach. For businesses and environmental advocates, adopting engineered EoL solutions, evaluating material trade-offs, and considering the full lifecycle are critical to minimizing environmental impacts. Additionally, this study underscores the importance of particle size in environmental impact, with smaller particles often degrading differently and sometimes releasing more GHGs.

Choosing sustainable materials involves more than selecting biodegradable or bio-sourced options. Managing these materials across their lifecycle—from production to EoL—is crucial. By focusing on these factors, we can make more informed, sustainable choices in addressing plastic pollution. Our sustainable materials R&D services help businesses evaluate these trade-offs in material selection.

Curious about how Life Cycle Assessment can benefit your business? Visit our LCA page to learn more about minimizing your environmental impact.


How Climate Change is Shifting the Baseline for Business Decisions

Written by Fabien Hammerer, 5REDO CTO.


Businesses routinely evaluate risks and opportunities before starting new projects. They weigh potential gains against costs to make informed decisions. Circularity initiatives—such as shifting from oil-based virgin materials to recycled or bio-sourced alternatives—are no exception. Before making these transitions, conducting a life cycle assessment helps quantify the environmental and financial trade-offs. Some circular projects, like finding partners to reuse waste, may have minimal impact on logistics. Others, however, can significantly alter manufacturing processes and introduce risks that must be managed.

The growing environmental crisis is changing the landscape of risk assessment. Typically, risk assessments compare new projects against a “status quo” scenario, assuming stable conditions. But climate change is already destabilizing this business-as-usual model. Extreme weather events like hurricanes, droughts, and floods are increasingly disrupting global logistics. They lead to cost volatility and resource scarcities that affect essential business inputs.

For example, in 2021, severe flooding in Germany and China forced temporary shutdowns of major factories. This affected supply chains for chemicals, electronics, and automotive components worldwide. In the U.S., lumber prices spiked nearly 400% during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was partly due to wildfires and unpredictable weather affecting timber production.

Other climate-related risks, equally critical for business owners, include:

  • Innovation and Competitiveness: Companies that delay transitioning to circular practices risk falling behind as competitors innovate toward sustainability.
  • Regulatory and Compliance Risks: Environmental regulations are tightening, with mandates for transparency and accountability around emissions, waste, and sustainable sourcing.
  • Brand Reputation: Consumers increasingly value environmentally responsible brands. Companies slow to act risk losing customer loyalty.
  • Increased Insurance Costs: As climate risks intensify, insurance premiums for climate-vulnerable assets and operations are rising.
  • Access to Capital: Investors are prioritizing companies with strong sustainability strategies, which impacts financing opportunities.
  • Legal Risks: Lawsuits related to pollution or carbon emissions are becoming more common, exposing businesses without proactive strategies to financial and reputational damage.

As a result, the risks and rewards of a circular business model—where resources are reused, recycled, and sourced locally—should not be compared against a risk-free baseline. Instead, the comparison is now with an uncertain status quo, one increasingly vulnerable to climate-driven disruptions that are likely to escalate over time. Shifting to circular practices can help businesses stabilize costs, strengthen supply chains, appeal to eco-conscious consumers, and address the risks mentioned above—all while building resilience in an unpredictable climate.

In today’s climate, the choice is not simply whether to change, but rather which risks to prioritize: the calculated risks of integrating circularity, or the compounding risks of sticking to a traditional model that may no longer be sustainable. For business leaders, this means making strategic decisions that not only address immediate challenges but also position their companies for resilience in an unpredictable future.

As environmental disruptions continue to shape the business landscape, the risk of inaction may ultimately outweigh the uncertainties of change. Now is the time to evaluate the cost of adaptation versus the growing cost of the status quo.

The climate crisis isn’t waiting—why should you? Start your circular economy journey today with our Circularity Integration Service.


Privacy Preference Center