Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) have become essential tools for sustainable construction, helping professionals understand the environmental performance of building products across their life cycle. With over 18,000 valid EPDs now registered in the International EPD System alone, these documents play an increasingly important role in green building certification and sustainable procurement decisions.
One of the key promises of EPDs is comparability. Because they follow standardized methodologies and undergo third-party verification, EPDs should theoretically enable meaningful comparisons between similar products. However, achieving this comparability in practice involves more nuance than many practitioners realize.
The Framework for Comparability
The EPD system is built on a solid foundation designed to support comparison. Product Category Rules (PCRs) establish consistent scope, system boundaries, and methodological requirements for products within the same category. These rules guide the life cycle assessment (LCA) that forms the basis of every EPD. ISO 14025 provides overarching guidance, stating that EPDs developed under the same rules can be compared.
This framework has driven significant progress in environmental transparency across the construction industry. At the same time, research examining EPDs within the same product categories has revealed practical challenges that users should understand when attempting comparisons.
Understanding the Challenges
Functional and Declared Units
The functional or declared unit defines the basis for measurement in an EPD, and identical units are necessary for direct comparison. PCRs often provide flexibility in how these units can be defined, which serves an important purpose since products vary in their functions and applications.
For example, insulation products might be declared per square meter at a specific thermal resistance, per kilogram, or per cubic meter with various performance specifications. This flexibility accommodates the diversity of products on the market, but it means that many EPDs within the same category are not immediately comparable on their stated units.
Some EPDs address this by including conversion factors, which is a helpful practice. However, approaches to these conversions are not fully standardized, so users should exercise judgment when applying them.
Methodological Transparency
Meaningful comparison requires transparency about key methodological choices, particularly cut-off rules and allocation procedures. Cut-off rules determine which minor inputs are excluded from the assessment, while allocation procedures determine how environmental impacts are distributed across co-products. Both can significantly influence results.
When this information is clearly documented, users can assess whether two EPDs are methodologically aligned. When it is absent, comparison becomes more difficult. Research on EPD databases suggests that this information is not consistently reported across all EPDs, which represents an opportunity for improvement in how declarations are prepared and verified.
PCR Version Considerations
PCRs are periodically updated to incorporate improvements and align with evolving standards such as EN 15804, which is a positive aspect of the system’s continuous development. However, EPDs developed under different PCR versions may reflect different methodological requirements, potentially affecting comparability.
For practitioners, this means it is worth checking which PCR version was used when comparing EPDs in the same product category. This information is typically included in the declaration, though its prominence varies.
Cross-Program Considerations
EPDs from different program operators may have different document structures and reporting conventions, even when they follow the same underlying standards. Analysis of EPD documents has shown that formatting and organization tend to be consistent within individual program operators but can vary between them.
This is not necessarily a flaw in the system, as different programs serve different markets and stakeholder needs. Platforms like ECO Platform are working to improve harmonization across European program operators. However, cross-program comparisons may still require additional attention to ensure that equivalent information is being assessed.
What This Means for Practitioners
For Specifiers and Designers
EPDs remain valuable tools for understanding the environmental profile of products, even when direct comparison is challenging. When comparing products, it is worth verifying that the EPDs use compatible functional units, are based on the same or equivalent PCR versions, and include the methodological information needed to assess alignment.
Rather than viewing EPDs solely as ranking tools, consider using them to identify environmental hotspots, understand which life cycle stages contribute most to impacts, and engage manufacturers in conversations about improvement opportunities.
For Procurement
As green building requirements increasingly reference EPDs, procurement specifications can help improve comparability by requesting EPDs based on the same PCR and requiring complete methodological disclosure. This does not guarantee perfect comparability, but it creates better conditions for meaningful assessment.
For Manufacturers
Completeness and transparency in EPD preparation support the broader goal of enabling informed decisions. Ensuring that your EPD includes all required methodological information, clearly states the PCR version, and considers the inclusion of conversion factors where relevant can enhance its usefulness to specifiers and improve confidence in the data.
The Path Forward
The EPD ecosystem continues to mature, with ongoing efforts to improve harmonization through mutual recognition agreements, centralized platforms, and standards development. The growth of EPD adoption globally, with strong international development and regional expansion into new markets, reflects the industry’s commitment to environmental transparency.
In the meantime, understanding the current state of EPD comparability helps practitioners use these documents more effectively. EPDs provide valuable, verified environmental information that supports better decision-making in construction. By approaching comparisons thoughtfully and verifying methodological alignment, users can maximize the value of this information while recognizing its practical limitations.
The goal is not to diminish the importance of EPDs but to ensure they are used in ways that reflect their strengths. With appropriate attention to the factors discussed above, EPDs can meaningfully contribute to more sustainable building practices.
Need Support?
Navigating EPD development and interpretation can be complex. Whether you are a manufacturer preparing your first EPD or a specifier trying to make sense of environmental data, professional guidance can help. Our team offers life cycle assessment services to support EPD development and sustainability reporting services to help organizations communicate their environmental performance effectively.
Originating from Barcelona, Laia’s educational journey led her to pursue secondary studies in the south of France. Her Bachelor’s degree in Economics and International Management allowed her to develop an analytical mindset. During her Master’s in International Business and Management, she engaged in numerous research study cases and actively participated in the creation of different business plans. This helped her develop an ability to critically analyze and address the strategic challenges that companies encounter.
Andre has over 5 years of industry experience in project management, polymer and composite processing, materials characterization, and product development. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from the Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil, and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Technology from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, where he focused on Polymer and Composite materials. In 2012, he founded a design and manufacturing company specializing in biocomposites made with natural fibers, which he successfully sold in 2015.
As an expert in sustainability, life cycle assessment, circular economy, and green chemistry, Nicolas possesses valuable skills and knowledge that can assist companies in developing and implementing sustainable and environmentally-friendly business models. They can achieve this by utilizing eco-friendly materials, improving manufacturing processes, reducing waste and hazardous chemical use, and advocating for the use of safer and more sustainable alternatives.
Karan is an experienced professional who has worked in multiple geographies and roles along his career. He holds a total of 10+ years of experience in manufacturing operations, and has focused his efforts towards finding solutions for waste recovery and making recovery economical for industries. 
With several years of research experience in France and Canada, Fabien lends his expertise and passion for enzymology and microbiology to 5REDO’s sustainability innovation plans. 
With her significant hands-on experience in developing and characterizing biological and chemical systems, Vicky plays a key role in 5REDO’s efforts toward developing novel products and technologies that offer improved circularity and sustainability to the industry and society. 
As a recent graduate of chemical engineering from the University of Waterloo, Kyle brings his passion for impactful innovation and his experience with novel recycling processes to 5REDO to support our technology development initiatives. 
As our Senior Research Scientist, Hormoz draws on his eight years of industrial and nine years of academic research experience in the areas of polymer science and engineering to develop new solutions for advancing circularity and sustainability.
Shauna is a freelance journalist that covers a wide range of topics, including health, education, the environment, travel, lifestyle trends, and more. She holds a Master of Journalism from Carleton University, and a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in Global Development from Queen’s University.
By leveraging her expertise in life cycle analysis and process engineering, Ophela helps 5REDO to take a holistic approach to the development of circular solutions and technologies. 
As the co-founder of 5REDO, Forough brings her expertise in supply chain management, business operations, inventory control, and revenue management to support the implementation of circular solutions within different industry sectors.
With a passion for driving change and creating impact, Mahdi co-founded 5REDO to promote circular economy principles in Canada. He’s an alumnus of the 2021 Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s ‘From Linear to Circular Programme.’ Mahdi played a pivotal role in developing and managing the University of British Columbia’s (UBC) Circular Economy Seed Funding program, fostering partnerships between companies and academic researchers to co-create circular solutions.